Boundary studies are nice for figuring out where something doesn't work and why it doesn't work. I've been thinking about where tagging and folksonomies break down for my FIS paper. Some of the cases I've been looking at involve web services where you tag people.
Tagalag is a no-frills system for tagging people. It doesn't really offer anything in the way of immediate personal incentive. In fact, the only thing you can do with it aside from tagging people (e-mail address required) is put your XML feeds together in an OPML list for easy aggregation. Very bare, and very few users.
43people allows users to track whom they've met and whom they want to meet. Popular tags include occupation, gender, nationality, and location. Tags are also used to describe characteristics such as "funny", "glasses", and "brilliant". This shows tagging as a clear faceted classification. "Find people also tagged with..." makes it easier for people to search for interesting combinations, and you can narrow the search to the current city. Usual problems with keywords: "smart" vs "intelligent", etc. Particular problem: funny vs hilarious, relativity.
Consumating is the weirdest. It's a dating site with a much broader audience than the other two sites, and you can tell that from the tags. The most popular tags follow the tag profile of 43people, but the recent tags look like one-off tags used for communication. That said, Consumating makes good use of tags in conjunction with polls, prompting people to keep refining their profile every week.
So: tagging other people is still a bit weird, but shows a bit of the folksonomic piles-of-leaves flattened faceted classification. Tagging one's self, on the other hand, is more of self-expression, ad guiding it with questions is pretty effective.
Random Japanese sentence: Ã£ÂÂ™Ã£Â‚Â‹Ã£ÂÂ¨Ã£Â€ÂÃ¥Â°Â‘Ã£ÂÂ—Ã¥Â…ÂˆÃ£ÂÂ«Ã£Â€ÂÃ£ÂÂ¾Ã£ÂÂŸÃ£Â‚Â‚Ã£ÂÂ†Ã¤Â¸Â€Ã¥ÂŒÂ¹Ã£Â€ÂÃ£ÂÂµÃ£Â‚ÂÃ£ÂÂµÃ£Â‚ÂÃ£ÂÂ—Ã£ÂÂŸÃ§ÂÂ°Ã¨Â‰Â²Ã£ÂÂ®Ã£ÂÂÃ£ÂÂ“Ã£ÂÂŒÃ£Â‚ÂÃ£ÂÂ«Ã£ÂÂ¤Ã£ÂÂÃ£ÂÂ¾Ã£ÂÂ—Ã£ÂÂŸÃ£Â€Â‚Ã£ÂÂÃ£ÂÂ—Ã£ÂÂ¦Ã£ÂÂ“Ã£Â‚ÂŒÃ£Â‚Â‚Ã¥Â‰ÂÃ£ÂÂ®Ã¤ÂºÂŒÃ¥ÂŒÂ¹Ã£ÂÂ¨Ã¥Â…Â¨Ã£ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂŒÃ£ÂÂ˜Ã£ÂÂÃ£Â‚Â‰Ã£ÂÂ„Ã£ÂÂ‹Ã£Â‚ÂÃ£ÂÂ„Ã£ÂÂ„Ã£ÂÂ®Ã£ÂÂ§Ã£ÂÂ™Ã£Â€Â‚ But then he saw a fuzzy gray cat over here which was every bit as pretty as the others, so he took it too.
It's exceedingly slow, but it works. Hooray, hooray! Kudos to http://individual.utoronto.ca/bonert/wireless.html for good instructions.
Random Japanese sentence: Ã§Â§ÂÃ£ÂÂ¯Ã§ÂŒÂ«Ã£Â‚Â’Ã¥Â®Â¶Ã£ÂÂ®Ã¥Â¤Â–Ã£ÂÂ«Ã¥Â‡ÂºÃ£ÂÂ—Ã£ÂÂŸÃ£Â€Â‚ I let the cat out of the house. Watashi wa neko o ie no soto ni dashita.
Dr. Brenda Laurel presents The Human Face of Research
Ontario College of Art & Design 100 McCaul Street (Yahoo! Maps, Google Maps) Toronto, Ontario M5T1W
Thursday, April 6, 2006 (6:30 PM - 8:30 PM)
An investigation into new approaches to design research, with an emphasis on human-centred design research, set within the context of emerging needs, technologies and forms of the 21st century.
Brenda Laurel is an acclaimed designer, researcher and writer, with a 25-year career in human-computer interaction (HCI) and expertise in interactive narrative and cultural aspects of technology. One of the founders of Interval Research Corporation in Palo Alto, California, Laurel conducted research into gender and technology, co-produced and directed the Placeholder Virtual Reality project, and co-founded Purple Moon a subsidiary acquired by Mattel in 1999. She serves currently as Chair and faculty member of the graduate Media Design program at the Art Center College of Design, Pasadena, California, and concurrently works as Senior Director and Distinguished Engineer at Sun Microsystems Labs in Menlo Park, California. Laurel has published extensively on interactive fiction, computer games, autonomous agents, virtual relation and political artistic issues in interactive media. She is editor of The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design [Addison-Wesley 1990] and author of Computers as Theatre [Addison-Wesley 1991].
Both presentations take place at OCAD's Auditorium (Room 190), Nora E. Vaughan Wing, 100 McCaul Street, Toronto. All are welcome to attend, and admission is free. For information, visit www.ocad.ca or call 416-977-6000.
Argh, argh, argh! I've already committed to going to the Toronto Coranto dance practice...
E-Mail from David Crow
Random Japanese sentence: Ã¥Â¤Â«Ã£ÂÂŒÃ¦ÂœÂ‰Ã¥ÂÂÃ£ÂÂªÃ§Â§Â‘Ã¥ÂÂ¦Ã¨Â€Â…Ã£ÂÂ§Ã£ÂÂ‚Ã£Â‚Â‹Ã¥Â©Â¦Ã¤ÂºÂºÃ£ÂÂŒÃ¥ÂÂ‘Ã£ÂÂ“Ã£ÂÂ†Ã£ÂÂ‹Ã£Â‚Â‰Ã£Â‚Â„Ã£ÂÂ£Ã£ÂÂ¦Ã£ÂÂÃ£Â‚Â‹Ã£Â€Â‚ He kept a white cat, who often played with a ball.
Awwww! Someone found OnTutoring useful!
This set of instructions for the tutor to take into account when tutoring is very helpful and lets the tutor know that it is not all about lecturing the student in the session. The student should speak more and the tutor should let the tutee set the agenda, this is how the tutee will really learn the subject matter. Also the tutor must keep a positive attitude so that the tutee stays positive about the subject and does not just give up. I chose this list because it is more descriptive than the first list, and it is more of an agenda helper while the last list was overall ideas that should come natural to the tutor.
I can use this list because it entails that the tutor will carry out these tasks so that the tutee is comfortable working with me. I think it is important for every new tutor to know that this is very important. You want to make the student feel welcome in the tutoring center, and you want to feel comfortable and personal in a session.
I would remove the parts that mention reading/writing because I am a math tutor, but overall this is a great list that every tutor can use.
Random Japanese sentence: Ã¯Â¼Â¡ Ã¯Â½Â“Ã¯Â½ÂÃ¯Â½ÂÃ¯Â½Â” Ã¯Â½ÂÃ¯Â½Â† Ã¯Â½Â“Ã¯Â½ÂˆÃ¯Â½Â•Ã¯Â½Â”Ã¢ÂˆÂ’Ã¯Â½Â…Ã¯Â½Â™Ã¯Â½Â… Ã£ÂÂ¯Ã£Â€ÂÃ£ÂÂ¾Ã£ÂÂŸÃ§ÂŒÂ«Ã£ÂÂ®Ã£ÂÂ„Ã£ÂÂÃ£Â‚Â€Ã£Â‚ÂŠÃ£ÂÂ¨Ã£Â‚Â‚Ã£ÂÂ„Ã£Â‚ÂÃ£Â‚ÂŒÃ£ÂÂ¦Ã£ÂÂ„Ã£Â‚Â‹Ã£Â€Â‚Ã§ÂŒÂ«Ã£ÂÂ¯Ã¯Â¼Â‘Ã¥ÂºÂ¦Ã£ÂÂ«Ã¯Â¼Â’Ã£Â€ÂœÃ¯Â¼Â“Ã¥ÂˆÂ†Ã£ÂÂ—Ã£ÂÂ‹Ã¥Â¯ÂÃ£ÂÂªÃ£ÂÂ„Ã§Â™Â–Ã£ÂÂŒÃ£ÂÂ‚Ã£Â‚Â‹Ã£ÂÂ‹Ã£Â‚Â‰Ã£ÂÂ Ã£Â€Â‚ "A spot of shut-eye" is also called a cat nap because a cat is in the habit of sleeping only a few minutes at a time.