There’s more than one way to plan your day in Emacs, just like there’s
more than one way to do everything in Emacs. The basic end of the
spectrum includes Diary, Calendar, and Appt. More sophisticated
modules include Org (part of Emacs 22) and Planner (available
separately). Then there are Emacs modules to export and import
calendar data to and from external programs, such as Remind.
If all you need to do is keep track of recurring events such as
birthdays and anniversaries, then Diary can be a good fit for you. All
it takes is one text file specifying the dates and descriptions of
one-time or recurring events, and one line in your ~/.emacs file to
display the diary entries for today whenever you start up. If you
switch to either Org or Planner later on, you can configure your Emacs
to include information from your old diary file.
If you find yourself wanting more integration with your task list and
your notes so that you can see everything related to the day, then
you’ll want to go for either Org or Planner. The choice between the
two depends on how you want to plan your day. …
If you’ve worked with a paper-based planner or a typical calendar application
for a while, then Planner might be a good fit for the way you think.
Planner has a strong day orientation. With Planner, you plan your
schedule in terms of day pages, and optionally cross-reference the
tasks with project pages. You can keep your schedule as plain text on
your day page, or you can follow the format suggested by Planner so
that your scheduled tasks and appointments will be added to Emacs’
appointment reminder system. Planner is similar to the scheduling
method of Franklin-Covey day planners and other paper organizers. I
like Planner because it’s easy to scribble notes onto my daily
schedule, just like I would pencil comments into my paper planner.
Org focuses on projects instead of days. With Org, you plan your
projects first, and then schedule specific tasks or appointments onto
your calendar. Your daily view is then dynamically generated from the
headlines of the outline nodes that are scheduled for the day. You
need to use a special format, but built-in commands make it easy to
create and edit timestamps. Org has great support for David Allen’s
Getting Things Done (GTD) productivity technique. If you think in
terms of next actions or outlines, Org is a good fit for you.
You can still think in terms of projects with Planner, but you’ll need
to remember to use the built-in commands for editing functions so that
your changes are also reflected in the day pages. You don’t need to
organize your Org file by project. You can throw everything into one
outline if you want. However, you’ll still need to use the
dynamically-generated summary view (org-agenda-list) to see your daily
or weekly schedule, and reading all the text associated with the day
could mean some jumping around.
If you haven’t figured out how your brain works yet, I recommend
starting with Org. I think that the project-based approach will
probably help more people out in the long run. I have to admit that I
love Planner and I’ve been using it very happily for more than four
years. I love being able to add all sorts of free-form notes while
going through the day, and Planner makes it easy to publish that as my
blog. (Automatically removing all my private notes, of course!) I’ve
gotten used to the way Planner works, and because of my extensive
modifications, Planner’s gotten used to the way I work as well. If
you’re starting from scratch, you might like Org’s better support for
projects, outlines, and overviews. Give Org a try first. If you find
yourself wanting more flexibility in your day view, try Planner next.
If you’ve tried both, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the
differences between them. I’m trying to figure out when one fits
better than the other because I’m working on a book called “Wicked
Cool Emacs”. I love Planner, I’m getting the hang of Org, and I’d love
to hear from other people who have given both a shot. =)
Random Emacs symbol: message-forward-decoded-p – Variable: Non-nil means the original message is decoded.
On Technorati: emacs