December 30, 2008

Bulk view

Not personal enough

It took me a while to write to the bottom of that one, to break through the confusion and anger and get to some kind of understanding. I’m probably not going to post all of that, because now that I’m looking at it through the slightly-numbed lens of a good cry and a cat-cuddle, it’s a bit much for something triggered by a few words from two people.

It’d be good for me to share the summary, though.

For many people, a slightly-personalized version of my yearly update was a good reminder in a convenient format and a prompt to perhaps reflect on their own year and plan the next. Most people replied back with their own updates and plans, and I’m in the middle of many enjoyable conversations that branched off from there.

For some people, though, it wasn’t personalized enough. After lots of scribbling, writing, and a surprising anger at unrealistic expectations, I realized that my feelings about this can probably be traced to these things:

  • Sharing parts of your life with distant people is HARD. Great letter-writers like Jane Austen or Isaac Asimov might be able to handle it, but I’ve still got a lot to learn. I’m tired of feeling guilty about this, particularly as I think these expectations are unrealistic.
  • I really don’t like the “this glass is half empty” attitude towards relating with people. It makes me uncomfortable and even somewhat angry. I know people don’t mean it that way, but it hurts enough for me to feel tempted to avoid it.
  • The generic part of the e-mail is like the generic part of small talk – it’s just there to start a conversation. It would be awkward to start a conversation with a friend you haven’t talked to in ages with a deeply personal secret, and it feels awkward to start an e-mail conversation with people I don’t share many experiences with using the same kind of tone and banter I’d have with people I interact with every day. I’d be happy to reply to people or chat on the phone/computer with them, but I’m not going to start e-mail like that.
  • I feel comfortable sharing a great many things on my blog. I feel comfortable sharing more everyday or tentative things in person, with people who share those experiences. The set of things I don’t feel comfortable blogging but I feel comfortable sharing with distant people is very small, because I’d rather talk about things in person with people who are sharing those experiences. If I needed to think through something, I am more likely to talk over it with my partner or bring it up over lunch or dinner with friends than I am likely to talk about it with my parents over video-chat or e-mail distant friends. I could probably sit down and write an e-mail about something, explaining all the background context, but it’s much easier for me to just talk to someone who knows all of that already, and getting people to that point is hard because it builds on all these everyday things.
  • I find it really difficult to start conversations. Reading other people’s Facebook feeds, tweets, blog posts, or similar lifestreams is great, because I can just think of my e-mail as responding to them. Posting things on my blog for some unknown audience is easy, because I’m just putting things out there in case. Starting from scratch is hard. So I’m too shy to start a conversation, but not too shy to post things just in case other people want to start them. Someday I may learn how to do this, but it’ll probably take me several decades to become truly comfortable with it.

The glass is at least half-full, and if we focus on that part, it’ll be much better than focusing on the empty part.

UPDATE: I figured out some more while cooking dinner! I realized that one way to get around my shyness is to keep track of which people prefer fully-personalized e-mail, and ask _them_ to write first so I can reply. ;)

Two screens without rebooting, with xrandr

Dual screens can improve your productivity by up to 50%. It’s one of the reasons why I like working at home – I can hook the desktop’s monitor up to my laptop for even more coding goodness. I could hook the Cintiq up if I ran X across a network connection, but three screens would just spoil me rotten. ;)

I used to switch my xorg.conf manually depending on whether I wanted a dual-screen or single-screen setup, but that required closing all my applications and restarting X. I wondered if there was a better way to do it. I came across Ubuntu Forums: Switch view modes (twinview) without leaving/reconfiguring X?, which led me to HOWTO: YES! There IS an easy way of trying out Xorg.conf without reloading X. The main post wasn’t helpful, but the segment “HOWTO: Make use of RandR 1.2 – or the ability to stick with one X configuration and dynamically add or remove screens and change display setups dynamically” was. I checked if xrandr was on my system, and it was. I removed the unnecessary lines from my xorg.conf and added the lines about SubSection “Display”… and it worked. Hooray!

For future reference, here’s the command I used to set up my dual-screen display:

xrandr --output LVDS --right-of VGA-0   

This rocks.