Is there a gender gap for self-experimentation? Maybe. I'm not sure. But I can tell you about the things I take for granted that might be making it easier for me than for other people, and how some of the barriers might be correlated with gender.
1. I have the privilege of time. It takes time to reflect. It takes time to track. It takes time to analyze. It takes time to be curious. I know lots of other people struggle with work-life balance issues. W- and I share household responsibilities fairly (if anything, he does more work), so we both have the time to hack. Many women bear a disproportionate burden of household and child-rearing responsibilities, which cuts into the time needed to reflect and experiment.
2. I have the privilege of asking my own questions. It means I can ask my own questions. Many people struggle with questions and goals posed from the outside. People are under pressure to ask themselves: "How can I lose weight?" "How can I get out of debt?" "How can I have more time for myself?" "How can I deal with other people's expectations?" I'm lucky that I'm not under pressure from these questions, so I can ask my own. Women receive a lot of this self-image policing, well-meant or not.
3. I have the privilege of experimenting with and building tools. I've saved up an opportunity fund for things like my smartphone. If I have an idea for something I want to track, I can prototype something using spreadsheets, customize my Emacs, or develop an application for
it. Many people aren't as comfortable with technology as I am, and many women have less exposure to technology for a variety of reasons.
4. I have the privilege of enjoying math. I like tracking my finances and my time. I like analyzing my trends. I like seeing the numbers and the graphs. Many people are uncomfortable with math, and many women haven't had opportunities to discover how much fun it can be.
5. I have the privilege of a network. I know people (male and female) who geek, who track, who hack. They inspire and encourage me, and sometimes they help me figure things out. Many women aren't as connected with other technical people.
6. I have the privilege of confidence. It's not easy being the odd one out, being one of a few women in a room or in an online space. It helps to know I can hold my own, that no one's going to patronize me because of my gender or perceived inexperience. Many people don't have
that experience, and women run into those subtleties more often than men do.
7. I have the privilege of understanding the big picture. To an outsider looking in, self-tracking or self-quantification might seem like a lot of work for little benefit. Why would anyone want to track when they wake up, or how much they spend on things, or what their mood is? It really helps to understand the bigger picture. For example, I track my finances because I like knowing when I can afford to grab an opportunity, and because I want to make sure my spending
lines up with my priorities so that I can live a better life. We geeks often talk about the trees without showing people the forest, so many men and women don't see why it matters.
Knowing the privileges I take for granted, then, I can think about ways to reduce the barriers that other people run into. It's hard to solve other people's work-life integration issues for them, but it
might be possible to inspire people to learn more and grow. It's hard to fight advertising and culture, but I work on counteracting common messages. It's hard to get everyone into programming or math, but I might be able to help early adopters with tools and blog posts, and
that can ripple out to others. I can't help everyone get connected or become confident, but I can share stories and help people come in. I'll periodically lapse into jargon and geeky delight over obscure details, but I can also share my big picture.
What privileges do you take for granted when it comes to experimentation, self-tracking, technology, or other areas? What can you do to reduce the barriers for others?
One of the insights I liked from "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" was on getting more out of your time by combining different needs or goals. Instead of keeping exercise and socializing separate, for example, you can combine them by jogging with a friend. It's like the way the negotiation book "Getting to Yes" reminds me to focus on interests rather than positions, opening up creative possibilities that combine different aspects.
A lot of what I do is like that: interests that support more than one goal, activities that build on each other. The straightforward time tracking I did with Time Recording (Android) allows me to capture one category for each time segment, but it doesn't capture those subtleties.
Time to take a step back and think:
Here are some things I'm working on learning:
I like the first option the most, because it works with my existing system and it's flexible. I may write a short program for doing a little bit more analysis once my reporting settles down, because I'd like to see how often I get to creatively combine goals. Option 2 is more work, and option 3 won't let me easily see other shifts while I'm tracking. So Time Recording it is, but with a slightly different way to use it.
John Handy Bosma (Boz) proposed a personal productivity random moment study. His goals are:
The interesting thing about randomness is that it might have a different effect on behaviour. If you can't anticipate when you're going to get polled and you're honest about your responses when you do, would that help you focus on more important things so that you don't catch yourself goofing off during the polling time?
What are good questions to ask during the sampling moment? Boz has:
These questions also helped Boz stay focused - immediate benefit.
Questions/ideas related to tracking:
Is the effect of uncertainty worth the added effort required to build a custom tracking solution (or buy one), or will fixed time intervals be acceptable? If fixed time intervals are okay, then off-the-shelf apps can be stitched together for this functionality.
Is there value in full randomness (ex: five reminders randomly set for one day, even if those reminders all come in the morning) or is it more about moment-to-moment randomness (ex: a reminder set randomly in each 2-hour period)?
In which circumstances would interrupt-driven methods like this be better than time tracking or time-and-motion-type studies? Boz shared that he never quite got the hang of time tracking, so it might be about enabling a different set of people to explore this class of experiments.
Does measuring time (either through sampling or through time-tracking) offer significant benefits over, say, tracking quantity of tasks completed in different categories (like Andy Schirmer does) when it comes to measuring alignment with priorities?
I might give it a try. I like my time-based analysis, though, so I may increase the granularity of my time-tracking (track at the task level whenever possible). I can then simulate work-sampling based on that data. I might also try fixed-interval sampling using KeepTrack on the Android, although I tend to skip interruptions.