NEW: For a prettier blog interface, see the Wordpress version!

Tasks

Priorities - A: high, B: medium, C: low; Status - _: unfinished, X: finished, C: cancelled, P: pending, o: in progress, >: delegated. Covey quadrants - Q1 & Q3: urgent, Q1 & Q2: important
B1XMake planner-copy-or-move-task do the right thing when given a plan page from E-Mail from Guy Bencteux {{Tasks:783}} (PlannerModeCompletedTasks)
B2XTrack down NASTY emacs-wiki and muse problem {{Tasks:787}} (PlannerModeCompletedTasks)
B3XTrack down emacs-wiki-published-function from E-Mail from Joe Corneli {{Tasks:785}} (EmacsWikiMode)

~/.diary schedule

Notes

3. ACM Technews: "Search Beyond Google"

Categories: None -- Permalink
From ACM Technews:

Google's enormous success with its search engine--and its apparent inability to develop a follow-up innovation momentous enough to sustain the company's market dominance--is encouraging Microsoft and other companies to invent their own tools that could eventually capture a good portion of ... http://www.acm.org/technews/articles/2004-6/0324w.html#item19

E-Mail from [email protected]

1. Remembering

Categories: PlannerMode#42 -- Permalink
A friend and I were thinking of papers to submit to the Loyola Schools Review. I joked, "What could I write about PlannerMode?" It's an organizer that I happen to really like, but which I don't think I can get other teachers to adopt (Emacs'll scare the heck out of them!).

I thought about why I liked PlannerMode. Planner as a TODO manager isn't particularly special. Although I can assign tasks to categories and so see a breakdown of what projects are taking up my time, Evolution and Microsoft Outlook provide more powerful task support. In other task managers, you can e-mail tasks, assign multiple categories and fill in all sorts of metadata. You can even synchronize your tasks with devices like a phone or PDA. So why use Planner?

I realized that integration into my way of life and automatic context clues are what really make planner tasks worth it for me. I don't have to switch to another application to create a task. I can just hit a keyboard shortcut. Planner uses a minibuffer to get the task description. My windows are not rearranged in any way, and I can look at the data that's relevant to a task. Not only that, tasks automatically pick up context clues, like whom I'm talking to on IRC or the file I'm editing at the moment. This cuts down on the explicit context I need to include and makes it easier for me to bring up the task again.

As a scheduler, PlannerMode is also not particularly distinguished. Sure, it can display my ~/diary, but for that matter so can M-x diary. Evolution and Outlook can give me a more graphical view of my time, sync with my PDA, and coordinate my schedule with other people. Those applications support detailed schedule entries with powerful cyclic options. On the other hand, PlannerMode gives me a personal, plain text view and (at least the way I use it) requires me to edit a separate file to add new appointments. However, it does have one advantage - my schedule is always loaded. I used to use Outlook on Windows, but having my schedule in a separate application meant that I actually looked at it very rarely, as I had turned off reminders because they got annoying.

PlannerMode's notes, however, are what really convinced me. I can hit a keyboard shortcut from anywhere and type my notes into a buffer which automatically keeps context information. After typing the note, I can then categorize it. I think that the critical thing here is that interruptions--fleeting thoughts--don't break my flow. I can just pop up a remember buffer, stow that thought away somewhere, and go back to it whenever I want. In contrast, creating a note in Outlook means switching out of my application, making a couple of keystrokes, typing the note in, and then switching back. The context switches make it hard to keep track of where I am and what I'm supposed to remember. Not only that, I need to enter context by hand. Even though I can color my notes and reorganize them in Outlook, I find the context switch too expensive. I used to keep notes in other knowledge management tools as well. Some applications allowed me to drag-and-drop links into the current note, and that was cool. But that required a manual action, and those applications didn't feel integrated into my way of working.

I guess that's why I like PlannerMode. Unlike other organizers which don't know anything about the applications I use, PlannerMode tries its best to integrate into the way I work, and it's easy to extend. Fortunately I do almost all my work in Emacs, so I can think of my organizer as integrated into my e-mail client, Internet Relay Chat client, web browser, file editor and even games. It automatically picks up context clues from these applications and allows me to easily jump back to relevant files. It doesn't distract me. It allows me to key in data and then it gets out of my way.

The processing that happens in the background (publish to RSS and PHP for me) is a bonus, and publishing my task list and notes online has greatly helped me. It gives other people a way to see what I'm working on and what I've planned for the future. Occasionally people write in with additional resources and helpful tips.

This made me wonder how to integrate it with more applications and make it available to more people. Yes, even the vi users and the non-Linux/Un*x geeks. Here are some of the thoughts that went through my head.

- What if everyone could have the equivalent of M-x remember even if

they're not using Emacs?

- What if we could capture context from any application?

- What if remembered thoughts could have multiple categories and

could be reorganized later?

- What if we could use statistical methods to suggest categories for

text and find related items?

- What if whenever you interacted with the system, related notes would

show up? When you open a file, browse a page or look at a contact, a sidebar could allow you to quickly jump to related topics.

- What if you could visualize your remembered thoughts to see how

they cluster around certain topics?

- What if you could perform powerful search operations on

remembered thoughts?

- What if it could pick up even more context clues, tying together

different applications? For example, if you do your e-mail in Eudora but keep your main contact information in Outlook, wouldn't it be nice if remembering from an e-mail also linked in the business card from Outlook?

- What if we could select some of these remembered thoughts and

publish them in different formats, automatically or manually?

- What if we could share our stream of remembered thoughts with other

people?

- What if computers could generate remembered thoughts as well, and

we could select which ones we'd like to include in our streams?

The more I think about it, the more I feel that this is worth studying further. If we develop this idea, other people can benefit from it - not just those who incidentally use it in the course of using PlannerMode! John Wiegley was onto something good here, and it'd be a shame to keep it only within a niche community. I'd like to make it easy for my mom to use this. =)

For my MS degree, I want to develop a framework for remembering thoughts from different applications. This means separating the front-end, the back-end, and the context gathering functions. Right now, everything is within Emacs. I'd like to split it up so that people using windowing environments like GNOME or KDE can get a nice dialog box if they want and people using other editors on the console can use their favorite editor to add notes. I'd like to split the backend up so that people can remember to SQL databases, plain text files, mail--anything and everything. I'd like to split the context gathering up so that application developers can easily hook into the system.

For my PhD, I want to look into managing all of this information. How do I find relevant documents now that I'll be capturing vastly more information? How can I make browsing my personal data store easier? How does it change my work style? Can I think of interacting with my computer--working on e-mail, writing documents, etc.--as interacting with a stream of remembered thoughts? Can it be my primary interface? If we shared our remembered thoughts with other people, how would that affect the way we work?

Related projects and concepts:

- Yale's Lifestreams project (concept of interaction with

time-ordered data in streams) - MIT's Remembrance Agent (implicit queries for relevant files) - MIT's Haystack - Zoe - Personal information managers - Knowledge managers - Information retrieval - Intertwingularity - Web logging

../../notebook/plans/2004.03.25

Previous day | Next day

I'd love to hear about any questions, comments, suggestions or links that you might have. Your comments will not be posted on this website immediately, but will be e-mailed to me first. You can use this form to get in touch with me, or e-mail me at [email protected] .

Page: 2004.03.25
Updated: 2004-11-2119:44:1419:44:14+0800
NOTE: ANTI-SPAM MEASURE NOW IN PLACE. Please answer the following question with the right number in order to send me your comment.
What is two minus one? (hint: one ;) )
Name:
E-mail:
URL:
Comments: