Developing opinions

How do I develop opinions? What is good to develop opinions about? How can I improve this process?

I’ve been working on teaching myself design. Good designs and bad designs both take effort to implement, so I might as well focus on good designs. I can read all the usability guidelines I want, but I need an aesthetic sense in order to bring things together into a coherent whole. Hence the need for opinions.

Lots of other areas benefit from opinions, too. Opinions can speed up decisions, save time and money, and help me appreciate subtleties. I’d like to form useful opinions while still being open to changing my mind in the face of good arguments or new evidence.

I don’t have a lot of strong opinions. I tend to take things as they are, see the value in multiple viewpoints, and not get too attached to things. I can identify and let go of decisions that don’t matter that much to me. In university, I nearly flunked my classes in literature. Art and music are still pretty opaque for me, although I do have a fondness for representational art and self-referential or otherwise punny music. Even when watching movies, I rely on IMDB reviews and TVTropes pages to shape my appreciation of what I’m watching.

W-, on the other hand, has a surprising breadth of well-informed opinions about things like kitchen knives, bicycle frames, and other areas. He has had quite a head start, though, so I don’t feel too bad.

Anyway, I have a lot of catching up to do. I want to set some parameters on my opinion-forming, however.

  • I want to still be able to enjoy simple things. I don’t want to refine my palate to the point of feeling that I need luxury goods, particularly if this involves artificial distinctions instead of true value. So it’s permissible to develop an opinion about different kinds of lettuce that I can easily grow or get from the supermarket, but I’m not likely to spend several hundred dollars on a brand-name purse.
  • I want to be flexible in my opinions. I should be able to acknowledge situations where the opinion is inapplicable and consider alternatives.
  • I don’t necessarily have to have an original opinion. It’s totally all right to follow other people’s opinions. As much as possible, though, I’d like to be able to articulate the reasons for my opinions (even if I’m choosing someone else’s position). In the beginning, I’ll probably lack the words and self-awareness, but I’ll get there if I keep explaining things to myself.

Okay. It seems that there are four stages in my opinion development:

  1. Anything goes. No opinion on these things yet.
  2. Do some quick research and pick a recommendation.
  3. Go deeper. Compare several approaches. Critically think about them. Pick one approach or synthesize several.
  4. Go a little further from the crowd. Come up with my own hypotheses and test them.

1. Anything goes: There are a lot of things I don’t particularly care about. I’m willing to take other people’s recommendations on them or follow my general principles. For example, I don’t have a strong opinion about most of the ingredients we buy from the grocery store, so I usually pick the lowest unit price and then move up from there as needed. Decisions that have low costs (time, money, attention, risk, etc.) generally stay in this category, although I occasionally invest time in thinking about things based on the frequency of the decision.

2. Quick research: I read a lot, and I’m comfortable digging through whatever research I can find online. Many of my decisions are in this category. I do a quick search to see what other people are saying or bring up points from books I’ve read, and we use those ideas when choosing an approach. W- knows a lot about comparison shopping, and I tend to be the one with notes for communication, personal finance, and education. Sometimes I turn these into blog posts as well, especially if I can follow up with the results of applying that opinion.

3. Going deeper: Sometimes research doesn’t turn up a clear answer, or I have to do the work in putting things together myself. I often request several books on the same topic from the library, reading them all over a couple of weeks so that I can see their overlaps and disagreements. Since it’s easy to forget key points and it’s easy to fool yourself into thinking you’ve made sense of something, writing and drawing help me a lot.

4. On my own: Some things are so uncommon, I can’t easily find relevant research. For example, I’m not the only one who’s done some kind of a semi-retirement experiment at an early age, but I don’t think I’ll find any books or online communities that already have reflections on all the questions I have. For topics where I’m on my own, I have to break things down into smaller questions that I might be able to research or test. Then I can write about what I’m learning, come up with ways to experiment, and share my reflections.

In terms of process, I tend to form most of my opinions by reading, writing, and trying things out. I rarely talk to other people in order to get their opinions about something, aside from the occasional people-related question where I’m curious about the approaches they’ve used. I don’t debate my opinions since I’m hardly ever interested in arguing with people. There’s no changing other people’s minds, anyway; only presenting approaches and helping them change their mind if they want. Ditto for me – people might disagree with something I write about, but I’m more likely to acknowledge a difference in opinion than to change my mind unless I really want to.

So, what do I want to get better at forming opinions about?

I’ve already mentioned design as one of the areas I plan to focus on. Philosophy is another: forming opinions about how I want to live and what I will do. Developing opinions on exercise will involve trying things out and paying close attention to how I feel.

I could probably work on my opinions about business, too. Reflection might turn up more opportunities that are in line with my current interests.

In terms of tech, I can become more opinionated about good programming practices, patterns, and frameworks.

Some consumer things are probably worth developing more opinions about because of their cost or frequency in my life. It may be good to develop an opinion about bicycling.

Cooking is a good area for opinions, since it’s all a matter of taste anyway. I can learn more techniques, get better at those techniques, and try different recipes. It might be good to develop opinions about gardening (particular cultivars? gardening practices?), although I’d probably need to develop the skills and infrastructure to start plants from seed first. Maybe start with salad green types? That’ll have a faster growth cycle, and I can also test things by buying different kinds of greens from the market.

Do I want to continue with my current process? Are there ways I can improve it?

One easy step for improving my opinion-building process is to capture more of it as blog posts. If I write about opinions as I’m forming them, I benefit from the explanation and the review. Other people might be able to share tips, questions, or ideas. There are lots of little opinions and opinions-in-progress that I haven’t shared on my blog yet. It could just be a matter of making blogging even more a part of my thinking process.

I can experiment with talking to more people while I’m forming opinions. I should probably be careful with that, though, since advice is a funny thing.

It might be interesting to be more explicit about the assumptions and hypotheses related to my opinions.

Hmm… Is this something you’ve thought about? How have you improved your opinion-forming processes?

7 responses to “Developing opinions”

  1. Raymond Zeitler says:

    “Is this something I’ve thought about?” Yes, many years ago, perhaps when I was your age, I was intrigued by folks who voiced strong opinions. I just didn’t seem to have that ability. Eventually I came to the conclusion that opinions are beliefs adopted by black and white thinkers, those ???J Myers-Briggs types, and so they’re irrelevant for me. But that’s just my opinion. :)

    1. SF says:

      Be nice to the INTJ overlords. If we deem it relevant, it is.

    2. Sacha Chua says:

      I think I’d like to get to the point of having lots of opinions weakly held; basically, opinions as just a concise way of summarizing what I’ve read, reflected on, and/or experienced, amenable to revision based on new evidence or ideas. =)

  2. Susi Doyle says:

    One of my goals for this year is to improve my appreciation for literature. I am an avid reader but I tend to categorize books into three categories: “loved it,” “meh,” or “couldn’t finish it.” I want to go beyond instinctual categories and discover why certain books appeal to me more than others and, for books that I don’t like, determine if it is because I disagree with the premise of the book, I don’t like the writing style, etc.

    Blogging has also improved my thought process. Even the act of summarizing a chapter forces me to examine how the author organized that chapter and whether or not I agree with the way the chapter was organized. My eventual goal is to take my blog entries on each chapter and to synthesize them into a book review. I have also found that the Goodreads community is helpful for online book discussions. :)

    1. Sacha Chua says:

      Yes, absolutely! I found that summarizing books as single pages of notes or writing about them in blog posts encouraged me to think about the books more deeply, picking out the key things I wanted to remember from the book. The notes also helped me appreciate the overall structure of a book, which is sometimes hard to remember when you’re reading page by page. =) Glad this is working out for you too.

  3. Michelle Ockers says:

    Where is the balance between deliberately, almost systematically forming a view or judgment about things that are important it us versus allowing these to “emerge”? This is what I am asking myself as I consider your post. I guess I’m formulating an opinion on your post. The first time I read it (2 days ago) I was intrigued by your analysis if how you firm opinions and the notion of systematically developing opinions. Now I think that many of my opinions are formed at a subconscious level based on my values and experiences without much thought – things that I ‘intuitively’ have an opinion on (e.g. Racism). Where I do form opinions consciously I tend to base them on my experience with things or visualising myself experiencing them (e.g. What if I was desperate enough to become a refugee and risk the lives if all my family by travelling illegally to a other country). Writing and speaking to others help me to identify my opinions, perhaps to form them – although my sense is that the formation if my opinions is more subconscious,. I do wonder if the 4 stage process you present is more about making decisions than forming opinions. Of course, you do need to form opinions on order to make a decision. Now I can feel my interest in how I form opinions waning. They will continue to form without me being too systematic or investing too much conscious effort into it.

    1. sachac says:

      Some opinions flow easily from values I hold or observations of my reactions to stuff. Other opinions are more amorphous, so those sometimes benefit from sitting down and really thinking about it. Yet other opinions are in danger of being set by default by other people or drifting over time in directions I may not want, so those benefit from reflection too. I think even the opinions that are easy to form (because they follow from other decisions, values, or opinions, or because they accumulate over lots of little decisions) can be worth examining from time to time so that you can explain them to people more clearly, you can poke at your assumptions, and you can think of the actions you could take in order to test your opinions or apply them towards living a good life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>