No, on second thought, my first graph is closer to the mark. I need to pay attention to the subtleties implied by the choice of graph axes. In this case, it's probably better to use cat affection as the independent variable, and proximity and people affection as the dependent variables. This graph implies that cat affection increases as proximity increases, where it should be the other way around. Hmm... So much to learn!
2 comments
Sacha Chua
2009-01-16T20:15:20ZNo, on second thought, my first graph is closer to the mark. I need to pay attention to the subtleties implied by the choice of graph axes. In this case, it's probably better to use cat affection as the independent variable, and proximity and people affection as the dependent variables. This graph implies that cat affection increases as proximity increases, where it should be the other way around. Hmm... So much to learn!
Jerry Callen
2009-01-16T22:17:15ZROTFLMAO!