Thinking about word counts and chunks

I was talking to Frank Chen about blogging, and he mentioned that he’s experimenting with word count goals. That made me realize that I don’t pay much attention to word count when I write, and that I tend to write shorter posts. I think in terms of chunks of ideas. I write each post so that it covers one idea, either something I want to share or something I want to learn. Sometimes I cover a little more ground, if I can chunk the sub-ideas enough to hold them in my brain at the same time. Sketches help me a lot when it comes to developing thoughts further.

I rarely write larger posts that bring lots of things together. I guess it’s because I tend to write about:

  • things I’ve just learned: publishing small chunks helps me get my notes out faster
  • things I’m figuring out: nibbling away at questions helps me make sense of them
  • answers to specific questions: small chunks and clear titles makes it easier for me to find things and share links later

What are some examples of longer posts and resources I’ve worked on?

  • There’s How to Read Lisp and Tweak Emacs, which I published as a four-part weekly series and also as a single file.
  • There’s the No Excuses Guide to Blogging, which I published as a PDF/EPUB/MOBI. I linked the source blog posts into a series so that people coming across the posts in the archives can still navigate between them.
  • I post presentations like The Shy Connector as slides and a full blog post. That said, I usually try to keep my presentations to about 10-15 minutes anyway, so the resulting posts are not enormous.
  • Interviews or videos with transcripts can get really long because I talk quickly. For example, this Emacs Chat with John Wiegley is pretty long. I’ve experimented with breaking transcripts up into logical segments, but keeping the entire transcript together seems to make more sense to me.

What would it be like to experiment with longer posts that cover more ground? Based on the blogs I like reading, I think it might mean writing more thorough guides like the ones on Mastering Emacs – things that people would bookmark and refer to a few times.

Organized guides help beginners a lot because they don’t get lost trying to figure out the next step. They can keep scrolling down. On the flip side, it might take a bit more work to make long guides friendlier for intermediate and advanced users: a table of contents, links to alternative paths or related content, closer and more coherent discussion…

Hmm. I feel a little odd about drafting a long resource (takes time to write and takes time to read), and deep-linking into part of a blog post can be a little difficult.

I think I like working with short chunks that I can link to or assemble into different pieces. Maybe I’ll spend a little more time planning outlines and series of related posts so that I can link posts together and fill in the gaps. For now, I’ll leave the ultimate-guide-writing to other people who are better at linear organization (or to future Sacha when she writes books).

Onward to better writing and sharing!

  • Richard Styrman

    Sacha your writing style is excellent!; its so much easier to pickup and understand small snippets of information. My method is write small snippets, then compile it to an overview document, which is structured. (Similar how scss and handlebars works.. my hack togheter: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yqx3245oyomdxkb/create_workflow.sh?dl=0 I got to be really really, REALLY structured for me to keep it in my head; for longer then 5mins, so I tend to do this alot )

  • Charles Cave

    Writing small chunks means you can assemble them into larger “pictures”. This is how I build the training modules in my job – short specific topic elearning modules of around 5 minutes which can then be assembled into longer courses and curriculum.

    • Nice. Someday I’ll get the hang of thinking in terms of courses and curriculums. In the meantime, you’re right, 5 minutes is actually an excellent size for a chunk of information. =) Easy to digest, and not intimidating (or at least it doesn’t look intimidating)… I’ll try to write more of those!

  • Richard Styrman

    Sacha: Here’s some more inspirational sources: http://slides.yearofmoo.com/1-2-animations-presentation/index.html … and http://coenraets.org/keypoint/phonegap-backbone/#0 the later one is mobile first; both really cool looking.

    • Richard: Thanks! I should think about making more of those little sketchnotes and presentations myself…