Drupal, Makefiles: save time, make awesome

| development, drupal, geek

One day I’ll post a generalized version of the Makefile that makes my Drupal life so much easier, but in the meantime, here’s the general structure I use:

  1. Lots of configuration settings:
    DB
    Database name for Drupal site
    DB_USER
    Database user for Drupal site
    DB_PASSWORD
    Database user password for Drupal site
    ROOT_DB_PASSWORD
    Root MySQL password, used to drop and recreate the database, and grant permissions
    SVN
    Subversion branch for source code control
    SVN_USER
    Subversion user name
    SVN_PASSWORD
    Subversion password
    SITE_DOMAIN
    Particularly useful when working with sites that use Domain Access, but handy even with other sites because of BASE_PATH
    SRC_DIR
    Location of source code, needed for Drush
    DRUSH
    Drush command line, just in case I want to fiddle with it
    DB_PREFIX
    Database prefix, for make clearcache

    BASE_PATH
    Base URL

    DRUSH_GROUPRE
    Regular expression to match against simpletests using my modified Drush_simpletest that lets me run all groups of tests matching a regular expression
  2. An include statement
    -include *.mk
    This is really useful. This lets you override the variables using a file like local.mk, dropped into your current directory and kept out of your source code control system. I use this to make my Makefile just Do The Right Thing when it’s in different directories or on different servers. Do not forget to tweak your included file (or make sure there is one) if you need different configuration settings.
  3. Lots of targets:
    backup
    Uses mysqldump to back up the database.
    restore
    Drops the database and restores it from the backup.
    clean
    Drops the database
    install
    Calls the site’s install.php with the appropriate profile.
    cron
    Calls the site’s cron.php
    mysql
    Starts a MySQL connection to the Drupal database. I don’t have to remember what the database name is or what the connection details are, hooray!
    clearcache
    Clears the {cache}, {cache_menu}, {cache_views}, {cache_content}, {cache_filter}, and {cache_page} tables
    revert
    Hits the panic button and reverts my tree. (because svn revert . -R is too long)

    tags
    Regenerate the TAGS file that lets me find function definitions really quickly
    test
    Use Drush to run all of my simpletest functional tests for this project

Sometimes I’ll have an “rsync” target to deploy files to a server and a “doc” target to regenerate my low-level documentation using doxygen, too.

This Makefile is seriously cool and seriously time-saving because it means that no matter which project, branch, directory, or server I’m working on, I have a consistent set of commands for the most common things I need to do. The less time I spend thinking about fiddly administrative tasks, the more time I can enjoy in the coding zone.

This is also one of the reasons why Drupal development is _so_ much easier on Linux or other Unix-ish systems, or even Microsoft Windows with the Cygwin environment. If you see yourself doing a fair bit of Drupal work, it’s well worth investing the time in setting up a virtual machine or a second partition, learning a new operating system, and re-setting-up your development environment.

make awesome. =)

What’s in your Makefile, or what other tricks do you use to increase your developer happiness?

You can view 11 comments or e-mail me at sacha@sachachua.com.

11 comments

Peter Kelley

2008-12-05T00:28:04Z

The idea of a makefile is cool, it would certainly make life easier. My background is in Java and in Java there is a tool called ant which does essentially the same thing. I think that ant and Drupal would work really well together. The advantage of ant is that it is cross platform so you can use it on Windows, Linux, the Mac or Solaris.

I might have a go at setting up an ant build script for Drupal.

Why didn't I think of this yet?

Oh right, I didn't hink of it because makefiles are a complete mess. autoconf, configure, etc, it all feels so incredibly senselessly complex.
Thankfully, Qt does a much better job with its .pro files. Step 1: create a .pro file. Step 2: run qmake. Step 3: run make. That's at least understandable.

Then again, I might be wrong and I was only pointed to the most horrible tutorials.

This makes *so* much sense. I'd love to see this makefile, even if it were a stripped down version. Just to get a sense of what it looks like, to find out how easily extensible it is (if at all – forgive me my scepticism).

Very interesting post :)

Oh, I haven't bothered with autoconf, configure, and all of these other things just yet. I use Makefiles as glorified shell scripts with variables I can change on the command line. =)

So actually it's not a Makefile, but a shell script that's called "make"?

No, it's an actual Makefile, but it isn't autogenerated or anything of the sort. Just a bunch of variables, an include directive, and a bunch of targets. =)

I'm blinded by awesomeness!

Carlo Pecchia

2008-12-05T08:12:11Z

Generally I prefer using Rakefile. I find it more clean and easy to read and maintain..

Drupal Themes Garden

2008-12-05T11:23:49Z

Nice.
Could you perhaps add source of your makefile (or some example), please?

It would be great to see this. Thanks!

Rob Russell

2008-12-12T13:44:04Z

I'm voting for your session to see your makefile. How helpful are dependency rules? I come from the C world so make makes sense but did you look at other choices like Ant?

I use a few dependency rules to ensure sanity (can't do a restore without a database backup, etc.), but because PHP is interpreted, I tend to not have many dependencies to worry about. =)

I've shied away from using Java-based tools because (a) I'd been more used to writing shell scripts, and (b) Emacs + Firefox + the LAMP stack + Java = way too much memory used, it seems. But I should try translating my toolset to Ant - I'm sure I'll learn a lot along the way, and I'll probably pick up a few new ideas too!